Monday, November 2, 2009

Sfile Announces New File & Serve Product

Sfile eServe Brings Multi-Party Document Distribution, Electronic Productions between Parties and Management of Court Communications in an Intuitive Software-as-a-Service Offering

Houston, TX (PRWEB) November 2, 2009 -- Sfile Technology Corporation today announced the immediate availability of Sfile eServe, providing file and serve capabilities to support law firms and courts. Sfile eServe delivers control, cost and time savings over key support functions throughout the litigation life cycle, including service of pleadings, court orders and discovery productions. Sfile eServe is currently in production for a complex, multi-party matter servicing hundreds of parties and users.

EFFICIENT MULTI-PARTY DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION

Sfile streamlines the delivery of court-filed and other litigation-related documents. Now law firms can eliminate the logistics of paper production and delivery by serving documents electronically through a secure, password-protected portal. Entities within the matter can receive immediate notification of when documents are served and can log in and access them in Sfile. Some of the postings commonly used within Sfile eServe include:

 
  • Public Notices
  • Pleadings
  • Court Orders
  • Notice of Appearance
  • Calendar/Schedule Items
  • Special Master Information
  • Productions

LAW FIRMS - LEVERAGE ePRODUCTIONS

Sfile's eProduction capability allows multiple parties to review and produce to each other directly within the system. With eProductions, data never leaves the system, allowing immediate access to other parties. Alternatively, parties may download delivered productions in order to use in their own applications.

COURTS - IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF COURT COMMUNICATION

Courts who order electronic file and serve delivery for specific matters or for their entire jurisdiction are able to achieve numerous benefits through improved efficiency of existing resources. First, courts are able to automate the intake process and allow clerks to review documents online for acceptance. Sfile's case monitoring capabilities improve communication through automated alerts of new documents. And maybe most importantly, calls and visits to the court are reduced as parties can view the status of filings or obtain electronic copies of court documents online.

"Sfile eServe has been developed in partnership with our customers who have received court orders to provide an electronic file and serve system in support of their complex matters," said Mr. Gomes, CEO of Sfile. "Our new eServe offering complements our existing legal solutions for electronic discovery, content management and virtual data rooms."

About Sfile

Sfile is a leader in eDiscovery 3.0, leveraging a true Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) technology infrastructure to deliver industry changing economics to an inefficient and costly process. Sfile is able to disrupt the current industry economic model through our integrated, unified Electronic Document Discovery (EDD) platform that combines evidence archiving, processing, early case assessment, document, review (native, TIFF-On-Demand and scanned documents) and production. Sfile also provides highly scalable and adaptable enterprise content management (ECM), eServe "file & serve" and virtual data room solutions.

See Also:

[Via Legal / Law]

Small Businesses Demand Enforcement of Penalties and Accurate Accounting of their Contracts

Size Protest victories without anything to show for them and agencies unfair reporting of small biz contracts prompts demand for congressional hearings. The Size Protest process must be strengthen (1) and the Data Quality Act (2) implemented.

Saint Augustine, FL (PRWEB) November 2, 2009 -- “My second Size Protest victory within two months against a large business which had misrepresented its size to win small business contracts (3) will help demonstrate that the size protest process does not work as Congress had intended and the process needs a major overhaul,” said Raul Espinosa, President of FitNet, a government purchasing group in Northern Florida. He added, “Violators are not concerned with the penalties Congress had imposed for fraud because there is no enforcement and the protest winners cannot get back the contract they fought for nor collect any fees nor expenses for their efforts.”

In 2005, Espinosa founded The Fairness in Procurement Alliance (FPA), following his Size Protest victory against a front for a large business to help demonstrate that the Size Protest process did not deliver justice (4) . FPA has since become a major national coalition to advance ‘partnership concepts’ and encourage bureaucrats to pay attention to out-of-the-box solutions. The flagship of this effort is The Umbrella Initiative (5) , whose goal is to level the playing field in government contracting not only at the Federal level, but at the State and local level as well. Among its published Reports, is a White Paper on Why Size Protests Need Strengthening (6) , which cites numerous mishandled size protest cases and recommends specific solutions for the process to deliver justice.    

FPA is now relying on its successes (7) to help secure funding for seven pilot projects in Florida (8) that do not only encourage small business participation in government contracting, but their projected results can be replicated in other States. Espinosa said, “The Umbrella Initiative pilot programs intend to make better use of existing networks of service providers such as the Small Business Development Centers (SBDC) and the Women’s Business Centers (WBC).”

Through an appeal before the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) for yet another alleged mishandled size protest (9), Espinosa is also attempting to demonstrate how Agencies are not only overlooking size standards violations, but allowing the abusive procurement practice referred to as unfair justification (10) to abuse small businesses. “FPA has demonstrated that the Size Protest process is ineffective at delivering justice and deterring fraud and abuse,” said, Borden Hallowes, Esq., Acting Director of the FPA Legal Center. He added, “There are entrepreneurial ways with which to fix the protest process and protect the statutory small business reservation with the Data Quality Act. FPA intends to bring attention to the ways it can be done.”

Anthony Robinson, President of MBELDEF said, “Espinosa’s determination since winning his 2005 key court victory to deter fraud and abuse in government contracting and help bureaucrats meet the objective of P.L. 95-507 (11) deserves the attention of Congress and the consideration of bureaucrats.”

Dr. Henry Thomas, Director of the FPA Think Tank at UNF said, “Our efforts are aimed at bringing attention to what we call "entrepreneurial solutions" that can level the playing field in government contracting. He added, "Our government is blinded by pro big business -- Too big to fail thinking."

Espinosa added, “FPA has corroborated what the SBA OIG has already claimed is the SBA biggest challenge: (12) Stopping large businesses from taking small business contracts and preventing Agencies from taking credit for small business contracts awarded to large businesses.”

“For small and disadvantaged businesses to receive maximum practicable utilization in government contracting, as required by P.L. 95-507, all contracting abusive practices must be eliminated,” said Roger Campos, President of the Minority Business Round Table (MBRT) and a Member of the National SBA Advisory Committee.

Paul Murphy, President of Eagle Eye, a strategic partner of FPA said, “Transparency has allowed us to show that Federal Agencies had taken credit for $4.01B in small business contracts awarded to 48 multi-billion dollar businesses in FY 2008 which the Agencies did not account for to SBA.” (13)

Bob Coakley, a former staff director to former Florida Governor and Senator Lawton Chiles who is a FPA advisor noted, “Congress ought to inquire into the accuracy of the underlying data of the SBA Report Card. He added, “The Data Quality Act was intended to extend the requirements of the Chiles authored Paperwork Reduction Act. OMB has an affirmative responsibility to ensure that information disseminated by the federal government is reliable. Moreover, the Obama Administration is insisting upon transparency of government operations. They should determine and act upon the concern that small and disadvantaged businesses were shortchanged $4.01B in contracts they did not receive.”

For the current government outreach initiative to succeed at encouraging more small and disadvantaged businesses to contract with the government, SBA, MBDA and DoJ have to cooperate and support entrepreneurial efforts at eliminating ‘fraud and abuse,’ and at opening more contract opportunities at all levels. “Eliminating the alleged illegal ‘exemptions’ on the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) will allow $64B in federal contracts to become eligible for the statutory small business reservation,” said Al Piña, Chairman of the Florida Small Business Reinvestment Coalition. (FSBRC) He added, “Accurately accounting for all Florida minority businesses and for the municipal and State contracts disadvantaged businesses are receiving. The projects of The Umbrella Initiative must be made a priority for the outreach efforts to succeed.”

Murphy, said, “The Umbrella Initiative and their projects will permit an accurate accounting for all disadvantaged businesses at the State level and for the contracts they are receiving from the State and municipal government.” He added, “The Umbrella Initiative intends to match state and municipal data to the Federal statistics and thus help State and municipal officials maximize all efforts at leveling the playing field.” (14)

Scott Amey, General Counsel for the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) said, “If the Administration is serious about acquisition reform, this is one of the first places it should look to enhance competition and improve federal contract spending.”

Congresswoman Corrine Brown along with other elected officials in Florida are supporting The Umbrella Initiative and its goal to establish a Minority Procurement Center at UNF (15) which would work on projects that would double the number of small businesses contracting with the government by the year 2020.

REFERENCES

(1) SBA IG Petition. - http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13394703/Congress-Asked-to-Enforce-Penalties-and--Revamp-Size-Protests

(2) The Data Quality Act. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Quality_Act

(3) Size Protests Decisions against Unisen, Inc. - http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13810534/Consecutive-Size-Protest-Decisions-Against-Unisen-Inc

(4) The OHA and SBA Decisions. - http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/10/prweb302024.htm

(5) The Umbrella Initiative. - http://www.docstoc.com/docs/3683947/The-FPA-UNF-Umbrella-Initiative

(6) White Paper on Size Protests.- http://www.docstoc.com/docs/3651041/Reasons-why-the-SBA-Size-Protest-System-does-not-Work

(7) FPA Successes . - http://www.docstoc.com/docs/11209387/FPA-Success-and-Track-Record

(8) Proposed Florida Pilot Projects. - http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4458661/?key=N2QyYzg3N2Qt&pass=NjA2ZC00ZThh

(9) OHA Appeal for Mishandled Protest. - http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13806343/OHA-Filing-for-Mishandled-Size-Protest

(10) The Unfair Justification Procurement Advisory. - http://www.prweb.com/prfiles/2008/08/31/162468/FPAAdvisoryUnfairJustifications.pdf

(11) P.L. 95-507. - http://www.docstoc.com/docs/3626707/The-public-law-that-defines-procurement-set-asides

(12) The SBA OIG Report 5-15. -http://www.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/documents/sba/oig_gcbd_05-15.pdf

(13) 48 Ineligible Firms - http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13948639/FPA-List-of--48-Inelegible-Suppliers-Awarded-Small-Biz-Contracts-in-FY08

(14) The State and Municipal Efforts. - http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13393316/Florida-Minority-Participation-in-Federal-Highway-Contracts

(15) The Minority Procurement Center at UNF. - http://www.docstoc.com/docs/6048073/Cong-Corrine-Brown-Supports-FPA-UNF-Initiative

See Also:

[Via Legal / Law]

nQueue Billback Excels Through Merger Integration

Strong sales, new products highlight third quarter.

Tempe, AZ (PRWEB) November 2, 2009 -- nQueue Billback LLC, the leading provider of software-based information accountability, expense management and cost recovery systems today announced strong sales and profitability for its iA (Information Accountability) product suite in the third quarter of 2009. The results were especially impressive considering that nQueue Billback LLC was just formed by the merger of nQueue and the North American operations of Billback Systems early in the quarter.

nQueue Billback continues to receive a positive response to the merger. "Firms nationwide are realizing that keys to increased profitability exist within their data and capturing it is the first step," said John Gilbert, Vice President, Sales & Marketing at nQueue Billback. "Law firms are looking hard at the bottom line and our commitment to providing products that improve it is the foundation of our success." All of nQueue Billback products are designed to capture expense data accurately, process that data and assist the firm in understanding how acting on it will improve profitability. Information Accountability, or iA, increases accuracy and understanding of data, improving efficiency through cost recovery, expense management, workflow and business intelligence.

Approximately 60 percent of nQueue Billback's new clients in the third quarter came through its established reseller channels while the remainder worked directly with its sales team. New clients are based in numerous cities including Los Angeles, Chicago, Indianapolis, New York and Minneapolis.

"Our team has accomplished quite a bit since the merger was finalized," said Rick Hellers, President & CEO of nQueue Billback. In addition to the strong sales numbers, third quarter highlights include a new website, participation in the International Legal Technology Association Annual Conference and ALA Regional Conferences, launching of new products including "iA Scan Powered by AccuRoute" and a road show to visit the company's current client base along with prospective firms. "I am extremely proud of our entire staff and look forward to continued outstanding results going forward," added Hellers.

For more information, please visit www.nQBillback.com.

About nQueue Billback
nQueue Billback LLC provides software-based information accountability solutions to more than 35 percent of the largest 250 law firms in the United States, and five of the Top 10 globally. The company assists firms by enhancing the automation and processing of any operational and administrative expenses, including print, copy, scan, phone, fax, travel, court fees, research, overnight, courier costs, credit card charges and more on an extremely powerful platform. nQueue Billback's software offererings, branded iA for Information Accountability, can be embedded directly into multi-function devices or reside on tablet computers or terminals to provide clients with the knowledge required to run their businesses more profitably. To learn more about nQueue Billback and iA, please visit www.nQBillback.com.

See Also:

[Via Legal / Law]

Jury Rules Against Blue Nile in $60.1 Million Lawsuit That Sought to Stifle Consumer-Friendly Price Comparisons

Following a six-day trial, a federal jury here dismissed Blue Nile Inc.'s $60.1 million claim against The Yehuda Diamond Company, reaffirming Yehuda Diamond's right to compare the prices of its clarity enhanced diamonds to the untreated diamonds sold by online retailer Blue Nile.

This is a momentous victory for all consumers and for free-market competition

Seattle, WA (PRWEB) November 2, 2009 - Following a six-day trial, a federal jury here dismissed Blue Nile Inc.'s $60.1 million claim against The Yehuda Diamond Company, reaffirming Yehuda Diamond's right to compare the prices of its clarity enhanced diamonds to the untreated diamonds sold by online retailer Blue Nile.

News ImageYehuda Diamond, based in New York, has earned widespread industry and consumer loyalty for its successful competition with Blue Nile and other online jewelers, favoring consumers not only with lower prices but also with unsurpassed expert face-to-face service and full Federal Trade Commission-compliant disclosure.

The suit [No. C-07-2017 TSZ, brought by Blue Nile and heard last month in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, involved Blue Nile's efforts to prevent Yehuda Diamond from comparing the price and appearance of its clarity enhanced diamonds to those natural untreated diamonds sold by Blue Nile.

Yehuda Diamond has consistently contended, even before Blue Nile filed the lawsuit against it in December 2007, that Yehuda Diamond's price comparisons are in the best interest of consumers. After 4 ½ hours of deliberations, the jury agreed, dismissing both Blue Nile's federal and state claims that Yehuda Diamond had engaged in false or misleading advertising.

Blue Nile, which has brought multiple lawsuits against smaller competitors over the past decade, had petitioned the jury to award it exemplary damages of $60,161,834.64, based on alleged actual damages of $20,053,944.88.

"This is a momentous victory for all consumers and for free-market competition," says Dror Yehuda, president of Yehuda Diamonds.

"In essence, the jury told Blue Nile that it can't use its massive size and legal muscle to prevent consumers from learning about lower-priced, quality alternatives to Blue Nile diamonds," explains Mr. Yehuda. "In recent years, Blue Nile has preferred to fight its competitors in the courtroom than in the marketplace."

The jury's decision clears the path for Yehuda Diamond to continue to inform consumers of how much they stand to save by shopping at Yehuda Diamond authorized retailers, who offer competitive prices along with personalized, expert, face-to-face customer service for its clarity enhanced diamonds. By comparison, Blue Nile untreated diamonds are frequently higher-priced and Blue Nile bypasses the retail distribution chain altogether.

Moreover, Mr. Yehuda vowed that his company will continue to press its own lawsuit against Blue Nile [Court Case #08-CV-9751 filed in November 2008 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

In that ongoing case, Yehuda Diamond contends that consumers who purchased rubies, emeralds, sapphires or jewelry containing those stones from Blue Nile were not informed that the gemstones had been treated to enhance their appearance.

As Mr. Yehuda previously noted: "We believe Blue Nile is deliberately misleading consumers about the quality of some of the gemstones it sells" in defiance of best industry recommend practices. "When a giant retailer such as Blue Nile does not do right by consumers, it taints our entire industry."

Yehuda Diamond has repeatedly endorsed full disclosure to consumers of any and all fillings and treatments made to valuable gemstones, including diamonds. Yehuda Diamond goes to great lengths to inform consumers of its own proprietary clarity enhanced diamond enhancement process, including prominent videos and text on its popular www.yehuda.com web site that illustrate the Yehuda Diamond proprietary technique.

Testifying at trial in Seattle, Mr. Yehuda cited Blue Nile's grading of its treated gemstones, such as rubies and emeralds, to rebut Blue Nile's contention that Yehuda Diamond acted improperly in grading its clarity enhanced diamonds after enhancement.

"Clearly, the jury understood the hypocrisy of Blue Nile saying that it is okay for Blue Nile to grade in this manner, but not okay for Yehuda Diamond," Mr. Yehuda noted after the verdict was announced. "More importantly, Yehuda Diamond is upfront and straightforward in telling our customers about our grading process, while Blue Nile keeps so many of its customers in the complete dark."

Mr. Yehuda said that given the jury's rulings in support of Yehuda Diamond, he has asked his attorneys to petition the judge in the case, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, to require Blue Nile to pay Yehuda Diamond's legal fees. Yehuda Diamond is represented by Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer LLP, a Manhattan-based law firm.

Full details concerning the price-advantages, brilliance and other characteristics of Yehuda clarity enhanced diamonds can be found at www.yehuda.com. In addition, the Yehuda Diamond web site explains why it encourages all consumers to visit an affiliated local jeweler and personally examine the diamonds before they buy - without cost, obligation or pressure.

For additional information, contact Dror Yehuda of Yehuda Diamond at 212-221-5985.

See Also:

[Via Legal / Law]

Sunday, November 1, 2009

ProStatServices Offers 10% Discount To New Customers Through November

ProStatServices is offering first-time clients a 10% discount off statistical data analysis services during the month of November. Businesses, non-profit organizations, attorneys, researchers, doctoral students and myriad other groups can benefit from the statistics help that ProStatServices offers.

Charleston, S.C. (PRWEB) November 1, 2009 -- ProStatServices is offering first-time clients a 10% discount off statistical data analysis services during the month of November. Businesses, non-profit organizations, attorneys, researchers, doctoral students and myriad other groups can benefit from the statistics help that ProStatServices offers.

"You no longer need to hire expensive consultants or permanent employees to do your statistical analysis," says Jeffrey S. Kane, Ph.D., President and Principal Statistician. "Now, you can outsource all of this kind of work to us."

One example of how the company can offer assistance to a business is by using statistical trends in operating data to create prediction models.

"Businesses such as restaurants, spas or theaters often have different numbers of customers arriving each day, varying according to whether it is a weekday or a weekend," Kane says. "We can build models to help predict how many customers will need to be served so the businesses can plan their staffing and inventory levels for a specific time."

Although many larger companies may have someone in the statistical field in their own employ, Kane says that he can often supplement, improve upon, or validate the in-house solutions.

"They may have an in-house statistician, but I can often see ways of analyzing data that perhaps more narrowly focused statisticians might miss due to my experience in applying statistics in a wide range of fields," he says.

Kane's firm can also assist companies in their efforts to promote employee satisfaction, retention, and performance through the development and interpretation of employee surveys. Recently, Kane introduced a survey method that allows companies to develop expected Returns on Investment estimates for alternative courses of action in such areas as compensation, training and development, and recruiting.

"The capability of expressing alternative HR initiatives in terms of their expected ROIs (i.e., Returns on Investment) greatly facilitates decision-making," he says.

Kane is often also called on to be an expert witness in support of the plaintiff or defendant in lawsuits involving charges of employment discrimination (e.g., in hiring, retention, pay, performance appraisal). He conducts analyses to determine whether there has been adverse impact in HR decisions, what the expected pay levels should be for various protected groups, whether there is a significant difference in pay levels between groups, and whether assessment devices (e.g., tests, appraisals) are valid and fair.

"In addition to working with companies large and small, I stay very busy helping researchers and doctoral students in all phases of their research," Kane says. "To the extent that their schools allow it, we can assist students in the process of formulating their hypotheses, developing a workable research design, putting their data into SPSS or SAS databases, deciding on what procedures are needed to test their hypotheses, conducting the analyses, and writing up drafts of their results. Of course, we are very careful about staying within the ethical limits on our involvement in these activities as specified by the student's school and department."

For information about ProStatServices, visit www.prostatservices.com. There, potential customers can view the services offered, the statisticians' qualifications, fee structure and more, as well as fill out an information request form.

For media inquiries, contact 843-856-5102 or email prostatservices(at)earthlink(dot)net

See Also:

[Via Legal / Law]

Doolittle & Ganos Investment Counsel Hires Industry Veteran Buzz Brown for Relationship Management and Business Development

Doolittle & Ganos Investment Counsel, LLC has hired Walton E. "Buzz" Brown, Jr. as Director, Relationship Management and Business Development Officer. Mr. Brown will serve in the firm's San Francisco Bay Area theater of operations.

Carmel, CA (PRWEB) November 1, 2009 -- Doolittle & Ganos Investment Counsel, LLC is pleased to announce that Walton E. “Buzz” Brown, Jr. has joined the firm as Director, Relationship Management and Business Development Officer. Mr. Brown will serve in the firm’s San Francisco Bay Area theater of operations.

After long-time service as the chief financial officer of the Arts Alliance Corporation, Buzz entered the investment industry. For over 10 years, he has served as a financial advisor to high net worth investors. Buzz has specialized knowledge in strategies for incentive and non-qualified stock options. He received his Bachelor’s degree in Business Management from Pepperdine University, earned a designation as a Certified Financial Manager, and is currently pursuing certification as a Certified Financial Planner®.

I’ve known Buzz for years and I knew at some point we’d recruit him. His dedication to clients and to professional partners has always been exemplary. He is a tremendous addition to our team.
“I’ve known Buzz for years and I knew at some point we’d recruit him. His dedication to clients and to professional partners has always been exemplary. He is a tremendous addition to our team," said Todd C. Ganos, Principal of Doolittle & Ganos Investment Counsel, LLC.

Mr. Brown can be reached at (925) 287-0348 or (866) 898-1860.


About Doolittle & Ganos Investment Counsel, LLC

Doolittle & Ganos is a wealth manager registered with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission as an investment advisor. The firm has offices in Carmel and Walnut Creek and serves clients from the North Bay Area to the Central Coast to the Central Valley. Founded in 1975 and with over 100 years in collective investment industry experience, the firm believes it best serves the client with a net worth of $2 to 20 million. The firm assists families and non-profit organizations with the goal of stewarding and transferring wealth to successive generations. It provides sophisticated investment and financial planning solutions for its clients' complex needs. Its services include wealth management, investment management, and trust administration services.

http://www.doolittleganos.com

See Also:

[Via Legal / Law]

BackgroundNow.com Releases The Federal Court Indictment, Docket, Motions, Notices and Orders as to Robert Cabelly

Robert Cabelly is a United States citizen living in the District of Columbia, and was the principal and managing director of C/R International LLC, a consulting firm located in the District of Columbia. For a period of time from 2005 until 2006, the work of C/R International was done under the name RCSR LLC. The former State Department Official turned lobbyist is accused of illegally Working for Sudan. The Indictment, Docket, Motions, Notices and Orders as to Robert Cabelly are now available at www.BackgroundNow.com for instant download in the PDF format. The court documents included in the download include the following:10/22/2009 (1) MOTION to Seal Case by USA as to ROBERT J. CABELLY.10/22/2009 (2) ORDER granting 1 Motion to Seal Case as to ROBERT J. CABELLY 10/22/2009 (3) SEALED INDICTMENT as to ROBERT J. CABELLY (1) counts 1, 2-5, 6, 7, 8.10/27/2009 (4) Bench Warrant Returned Executed on 10/27/09 as to ROBERT J. CABELLY.10/27/2009 (5) ORDER Setting Conditions of Release as to ROBERT J. CABELLY.10/29/2009 (6) NOTICE Notice Of Intent To Use Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Information by USA as to ROBERT J. CABELLY.

Robert Cabelly and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed with one another to (1) to violate IEEPA and the Sudanese Sanctions

Katy, TX (PRWEB) November 1, 2009 -- Robert Cabelly is a United States citizen living in the District of Columbia, and was the principal and managing director of C/R International LLC, a consulting firm located in the District of Columbia. For a period of time from 2005 until 2006, the work of C/R International was done under the name RCSR LLC. The former State Department Official turned lobbyist is accused of illegally Working for Sudan.

ROBERT CABELLY COURT FILES AS OF 2009-10-30
ROBERT CABELLY COURT FILES AS OF 2009-10-30
The Indictment, Docket, Motions, Notices and Orders as to Robert Cabelly are now available for instant download in PDF format at www.BackgroundNow.com. A service fee applies.

Robert Cabelly is charged with:

(1) 18:371, 50:1701-1706, 31 C.F.R. Part 538, Executive Orders 13067 and 13412, and 18:951; CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES.
(2-5) 50:1701-1706, 31 C.F.R. Parts 538 and 538.207, and Executive Orders 13067 and 13412; Violation of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations.
(6) 18:1956(a)(2)(B)(i) and 18:2; MONEY LAUNDERING; Money Laundering, Aiding and Abetting and Causing an Act to be Done.
(7) 18:1542; FALSE STATEMENT IN APPLICATION/USE OF PASSPORT; False Statement in Application and Use of Passport.
(8) 18:1001(a)(2) and (3); STATEMENTS OR ENTRIES GENERALLY; False Statement.

EXCERPT

Beginning in or about January 2005, and continuing to at least in or about September 2007, in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, defendant

ROBERT J. CABELLY

and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed with one another to commit an offense, that is:

(1) to violate IEEPA and the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations, without having first obtained the required authorizations from OFAC, located in the District of Columbia, by (a) exporting, directly and indirectly, to Sudan goods, technology, and services from the United States and by a United States person, (b) facilitating by a United States person, including brokering activities, the exportation of goods, technology, and services, to Sudan, (c) performing by a United States person a contract in support of an industrial, commercial, public utility, and government project in Sudan, and (d) engaging in a transaction by a United States person and within the United States that evades and avoids, and has the purpose of evading and avoiding, the prohibitions of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations, in violation of Title 50, United States Code, Sections 1701-1706, 31 C.F.R. Part 538, Executive Orders 13067 and 13412; and (2) to knowingly act in the United States as an agent of a foreign government, namely Sudan, without prior notification to the Attorney General as required law, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 951(a).

###

See Also:

[Via Legal / Law]